UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended April 29, 2005

THE TORO COMPANY

8111 Lyndale Avenue South
Bloomington, Minnesota 55420
Telephone number: (952) 888-8801

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of May 27, 2005 was 43,112,997.

THE TORO COMPANY
INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

2

PART I. ITEM 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

THE TORO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Shares and per share data have been adjusted for all periods presented to reflect a two-for-one stock split effective March 28, 2005.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

THE TORO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Shares and per share data have been adjusted for all periods presented to reflect a two-for-one stock split effective March 28, 2005.

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

THE TORO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

THE TORO COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “company” and “Toro” refer to The Toro Company and its subsidiaries. In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting primarily of recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations. Since the company’s business is seasonal, operating results for the six months ended April 29, 2005 cannot be annualized to determine the expected results for the fiscal year ending October 31, 2005. Certain amounts from prior period’s financial statements have been reclassified to conform to this period’s presentation.

     The company’s fiscal year ends on October 31, and quarterly results are reported based on three month periods that generally end on the Friday closest to the quarter end. For comparative purposes, however, the company’s second and third quarters always include exactly 13 weeks of results so that the quarter end date for these two quarters is not necessarily the Friday closest to the quarter end.

     For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004. The policies described in that report are used for preparing quarterly reports.

Accounting Policies

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management must make decisions that impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In reaching such decisions, management applies judgments based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances, historical experience, and actuarial valuations. Actual amounts could differ from those estimated at the time the consolidated financial statements are prepared. Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K provides a summary of the significant accounting policies followed in the preparation of the financial statements. Other footnotes in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K describe various elements of the financial statements and the assumptions made in determining specific amounts.

Stock Split

On March 15, 2005, the company’s Board of Directors declared a two-for-one stock split of the company’s common stock, effected in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend paid on April 12, 2005. As a result of this action, approximately 21.7 million shares were issued to stockholders of record as of March 28, 2005. Par value of the common stock remains at $1.00 per share and accordingly, approximately $21.7 million was transferred from retained earnings to common stock. All references to the number of common shares and per common share amounts have been adjusted to give retroactive effect to the stock split for all periods presented.

Acquisition

On February 8, 2005, the company completed the acquisition of certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Hayter Limited (Hayter). Hayter designs, manufactures, and markets residential and professional turf maintenance equipment primarily for the United Kingdom market, with expected additional sales to Toro of approximately $35 million for fiscal 2005. If the acquisition of Hayter would have been consummated as of November 1, 2004, the expected impact on Toro’s sales would have been an increase of approximately $50 million for fiscal 2005. The preliminary purchase price was approximately $35 million, which was paid in cash, and included $31 million of current assets; $10.6 million of property, plant, and equipment; $7.1 million of intangible assets; and $13.4 million of assumed liabilities. The purchase price allocation is preliminary, and has been allocated to the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values, with the excess purchase price recorded as goodwill. The purchase price should be finalized during the third quarter of fiscal 2005, with any necessary adjustments based on settlement of the final working capital statement to be recorded at that time. See note sections entitled “Goodwill” and “Other Intangible Assets” for further details related to the acquired intangible assets.

6

Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income and the components of other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:

Stock-Based Compensation

Effective November 1, 2004, the company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” The company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective application, which applies to new awards granted, unvested awards as of the date of adoption, and to awards modified, repurchased or cancelled after the date of adoption. SFAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services through share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123R requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for the award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award as of the date of grant. The company had previously accounted for share-based compensation under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (APB No. 25), and related Interpretations.

     During the first quarter of fiscal 2005, option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the company’s stock as of the date of grant. For certain non-officer employees, the 2005 options vest over two years and have a five-year contractual term. This was the first time the two-year vesting was required for options granted to the non-officer employee group. Other options granted during the first quarter of fiscal 2005 vest over a one- to three-year period and have a ten-year contractual term. No stock-based awards were granted during the second quarter of fiscal 2005.

     The company also issues Performance Shares to key employees. Under the provisions of APB No. 25, the change in value of these Performance Shares (based on the change in Toro’s stock price) was recognized in the financial statements and the cost of the award was expensed over the vesting period. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, the company determines the fair value of these Performance Shares as of the date of grant and recognizes the expense over the vesting period.

     The following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and net earnings per share if the company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123R for the second quarter and year-to-date periods of fiscal 2004.

Shares and per share data have been adjusted for all periods presented to reflect a two-for-one stock split effective March 28, 2005.

7

The fair value of each share-based option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation method that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The expected life is a significant assumption as it determines the period for which the risk-free interest rate, volatility, and dividend yield must be applied. The expected life is the average length of time the employee groups will exercise their options, which is based on historical experience with similar grants. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Expected volatilities are based on the movement of the company’s stock over the most recent historical period equivalent to the expected life of the option. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury rate over the expected life at the time of grant. Dividend yield is estimated over the expected life based on the company’s dividend policy, historical dividends paid, and expected increase in the company’s stock price. The following table illustrates the assumptions for options granted in the following fiscal years.

The weighted-average fair value of options granted during the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004 was $11.14 and $7.69, respectively. The fair value of Performance Shares granted during the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004 was $37.02 and $24.16, respectively. No options or Performance Shares were granted during the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and 2004.

The following table illustrates the effect on the company’s earnings, net earnings, and earnings per share if the company had applied the original provisions of APB No. 25 and related interpretations instead of SFAS No. 123R.

(2) Pro forma assumes the application of the provisions of APB No. 25.

8

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for most inventories and first-in, first-out (FIFO) for all other inventories. The company establishes a reserve for excess, slow-moving, and obsolete inventory that is the difference between the cost and estimated market value for that inventory. These reserves are based on a review and comparison of current inventory levels to the production and sales history of the inventory.

Inventories were as follows:

Per Share Data

Reconciliations of basic and dilutive weighted average shares of common stock outstanding are as follows:

Shares for all periods presented have been adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock split effective March 28, 2005.

Segment Data

The presentation of segment information reflects the manner in which management organizes segments for making operating decisions and assessing performance. On this basis, the company has determined it has two reportable business segments: Professional and Residential. The Other segment consists of company-owned distributor operations in the United States and corporate activities, including corporate financing activities and elimination of intersegment revenues and expenses. Effective the beginning of fiscal 2005, the company combined the Distribution segment with the Other segment because the company-owned distributorships that comprised the former Distribution segment do not meet the quantitative thresholds for separate reporting as an operating segment for all periods presented. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

9

The following table shows the summarized financial information concerning the company’s reportable segments:

The following table presents the details of the Other segment earnings (loss) before income taxes:

Goodwill

The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the first six months of fiscal 2005 were as follows:

Other Intangible Assets

As a result of the company’s acquisition of Hayter, as previously discussed, the company acquired $2.6 million of non-amortizable intangible assets related to the Hayter brand name. The company also acquired $1.3 million of amortizable customer related intangible assets with an estimated life of 10 years.

10

The components of other amortizable intangible assets were as follows:

Amortization expense for intangible assets during the first six months of fiscal 2005 was $347,000. Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal 2005 and succeeding fiscal years is as follows: 2005 (remainder), $379,000; 2006, $731,000; 2007, $537,000; 2008, $411,000; 2009, $251,000; 2010, $175,000 and after 2010, $702,000.

Warranty Guarantees

The company’s products are warranted to ensure customer confidence in design, workmanship, and overall quality. Warranty coverage ranges from a period of six months to seven years, and generally covers parts, labor, and other expenses for non-maintenance repairs, provided operator abuse, improper use, or negligence did not necessitate the repair. An authorized Toro distributor or dealer must perform warranty work. Distributors, dealers, and contactors submit claims for warranty reimbursement and are credited for the cost of repairs, labor and other expenses as long as the repairs meet prescribed standards. Warranty expense is accrued at the time of sale based on the estimated number of products under warranty, historical average costs incurred to service warranty claims, the trend in the historical ratio of claims to sales, the historical length of time between the sale and resulting warranty claim, and other minor factors. Special warranty reserves are also accrued for major rework campaigns. The company also sells additional warranty coverage on select products when the factory warranty period expires.

Warranty provisions, claims, and changes in estimates for the first six-month periods in fiscal 2005 and 2004 were as follows:

Postretirement Benefit Plans

The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit costs:

As of April 29, 2005, approximately $290,000 of contributions had been made. The company presently expects to contribute a total of $580,000 to its postretirement health-care benefit plan in fiscal 2005.

     The company maintains The Toro Company Investment, Savings and Employee Stock Ownership Plan for eligible employees. The company’s expenses under this plan were $4.0 million and $7.7 million for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005, respectively, and $3.4 million and $6.6 million for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2004, respectively.

     The company assumed a liability of approximately $4.6 million for Hayter’s defined benefit pension plan. Estimated contributions and expense for fiscal 2005 for the plan are deemed immaterial to the company’s consolidated financial results.

11

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The company uses derivative instruments to assist in the management of exposure to currency exchange rates. The company uses derivative instruments only to limit underlying exposure to currency fluctuations, and not for trading purposes. The company documents relationships between hedging instruments and the hedged items, as well as its risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The company assesses, both at the hedge’s inception and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged item.

     The company enters into foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge the risk from forecasted settlements in local currencies of trade sales and purchases. These contracts are designated as cash flow hedges with the fair value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and as a hedge asset or liability in prepaid expenses or accrued liabilities, as applicable. Once the forecasted transaction has been recognized as a sale or inventory purchase and a related asset or liability recorded in the balance sheet, the related fair value of the derivative hedge contract is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings. During the three and six months ended April 29, 2005, the amount of losses reclassified to earnings for such cash flow hedges was $0.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended April 29, 2005, the losses treated as a reduction of net sales for contracts to hedge trade sales were $2.7 million and the gains treated as a reduction of cost of sales for contracts to hedge inventory purchases were $0.5 million. As of April 29, 2005, the notional amount of such contracts outstanding was $70.5 million. The unrecognized after-tax loss portion of the fair value of the contracts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of April 29, 2005 was $0.1 million.

     The company also enters into other foreign currency exchange contracts. These contracts are intended to hedge intercompany financing transactions and other activities that are not designed as hedging instruments under the accounting criteria of SFAS No. 133; therefore, changes in fair value of these instruments are recorded in other income, net.

Contingencies

On June 3, 2004, eight individuals who claim to have purchased lawnmowers in Illinois and Minnesota filed a lawsuit (Ronnie Phillips et al. v. Sears Roebuck Corporation et. al., No.04-L-334 (20th Judicial Circuit, St., Clair County, IL)) against the company and other defendants alleging that the horsepower labels on the products the plaintiffs purchased were inaccurate. The plaintiffs seek certification of a class of all persons in the United States who, beginning January 1, 1995 through the present, purchased a lawnmower containing a two stroke or four stroke gas combustible engine up to 20 horsepower that was manufactured or sold by the defendants. The complaint seeks an injunction, unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees. No answers have been entered in the case, and there has been no formal discovery. A number of procedural motions have been filed by the defendants, but have not yet been decided. On April 20, 2005, the court issued a stay of discovery and procedural matters to permit the parties to engage in settlement discussions. Management continues to evaluate this lawsuit. The company is unable to reasonably estimate the amount or range of potential loss that could result from this litigation, and therefore has not established a reserve for any potential loss in connection with this lawsuit. The company is also unable to assess at this time whether the lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated operating results or financial condition.

     In the ordinary course of business, in addition to that described above, the company may become liable with respect to pending and threatened claims or litigation for product liability, tax, patent, environmental, and other matters. While the ultimate results of current claims, investigations, and lawsuits involving the company are unknown at this time, management believes that, except for the lawsuit discussed above, the outcomes of these cases are unlikely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operating results or financial position of the company.

Related Party Transactions

On April 6, 2005, the company purchased 72,476 shares of Toro common stock at a per share purchase price of $45.00 from Kendrick B. Melrose, Executive Chairman of the Board. The purchase was effected under the terms of an Officer Stock Purchase Policy, which was approved by Toro’s Board of Directors on September 16, 1999. As required under the terms of the policy, the per share purchase price was determined based on the closing price of a share of Toro common stock on April 5, 2005 of $45.00 per share, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.

12

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Nature of Operations

The Toro Company is in the business of designing, manufacturing, and marketing professional turf maintenance equipment and services, turf and agricultural irrigation systems, landscaping equipment, and residential yard products worldwide. Our products are sold through a network of distributors, dealers, hardware retailers, home centers, mass retailers, and over the Internet, mainly through Internet retailers. Our businesses are organized into two segments: professional and residential. A third segment called “other” consists of domestic distribution companies and corporate activities. Our emphasis is to provide well-built, dependable, and innovative products supported by an extensive service network. A significant portion of our revenues has historically been attributable to new and enhanced products. As we continue with our “6 + 8” profitability and growth initiative, we expect to invest in growth strategies at higher than historical levels. The goals of this initiative are to achieve a consistent after-tax return on net sales of 6 percent or more and grow revenues at an average rate of 8 percent or more over the three-year period ending October 31, 2006.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Our results for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 were strong with double digit sales and earnings growth. Our net earnings rose 18.7 percent compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2004 on a net sales growth rate of 14.7 percent. Year-to-date net earnings rose 18.9 percent compared to the same period last year on a year-to-date sales growth rate of 13.2 percent. Factoring out the additional sales from our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Hayter Limited, a company that designs, manufactures, and markets residential and professional turf maintenance equipment primarily for the United Kingdom market, net sales were up 11.4 percent and 11.1 percent for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005, respectively, from the same comparable periods in the prior year. Sales were up for our professional segment as a result of strong retail demand for our products, price increases, favorable currency rates, and the introduction of new products. Residential segment net sales also increased as we introduced new products with expanded placement at key retailers. As part of our “6 + 8” initiative, we are investing in growth strategies directed at underserved markets, such as revitalizing the Lawn-Boy brand with new products and accelerating our growth in international markets, as evidenced by our acquisition of substantially all of the assets of Hayter Limited. Gross margins are expected to continue to be hampered by rising commodity prices; however, we continue to work to mitigate the impact of rising commodity costs through internal cost reduction efforts from past and continuing initiatives driven by our emphasis on lean manufacturing methods and selective price increases. Our financial condition remains strong, which has allowed us to pay a quarterly cash dividend in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 that was double from the quarterly cash dividend we paid in the second quarter of fiscal 2004 and has allowed us to continue to repurchase shares of our common stock.

     Our fiscal 2005 second quarter results were strong, and we are optimistic that our results for the full fiscal year of 2005 will also be strong, although we do not expect our full fiscal 2005 results to be as strong as the first six months. Our net sales and net earnings are historically highest in our fiscal second quarter. Sales are currently expected to grow at an annual rate of 9 to 11 percent in fiscal 2005 and diluted net earnings per share is currently expected to grow at an annual rate of 15 to 18 percent over fiscal 2004, which includes the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R as of the beginning of fiscal 2005 and the acquisition of Hayter Limited during the second quarter of fiscal 2005. We continue, however, to keep a cautionary eye on the world economies, weather, field inventory levels, retail demand, commodity prices, competition, and other factors identified below under the heading “Forward-Looking Information,” which could cause our actual results to differ from our outlook. In particular, we recognize the adverse effect of cold, wet weather in our key geographic markets has had on our fiscal second quarter residential segment retail demand, which could have a negative impact our fiscal third quarter net sales if such weather patterns continue.

Net Earnings

Net earnings for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 were $62.0 million or $1.33 per diluted share compared to $52.2 million or $1.00 per diluted share for the second quarter of fiscal 2004, a net earnings increase of 18.7 percent. Year-to-date net earnings in fiscal 2005 were $73.1 million or $1.55 per diluted share compared to $61.5 million or $1.18 per diluted share last year, a net earnings increase of 18.9 percent. The primary factors contributing to these increases were higher sales volumes and improved leveraging of selling, general, and administrative expense, somewhat offset by lower gross margin and higher interest expense. In addition, second quarter and year-to-date of fiscal 2005 diluted earnings per share were benefited by approximately $0.14 per share and $0.15 per share, respectively, compared to the same periods in fiscal 2004 as a result of reduced shares outstanding due to our significant Toro common stock repurchases during the past twelve months.

13

     Effective November 1, 2004, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, as previously discussed. However, if we had applied the provisions of SFAS No. 123R during the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2004, diluted earnings per share would have increased by $0.03 per share to $1.03 per share for the second quarter of fiscal 2004 and would have decreased by $0.01 per share to $1.17 per share for the year-to-date period of fiscal 2004. The second quarter of fiscal 2004 increase in diluted earnings per share of $0.03 per share resulted from higher incentive compensation expense recognized under the provisions of APB No. 25 for our Performance Share Plan in fiscal 2004 as a result of the increase in Toro’s stock price during the second quarter of fiscal 2004. See note sections entitled “Stock-Based Compensation” for further details. The fiscal 2004 year-to-date per share decline in diluted earnings per share of $0.01 per share resulted from compensation expense that would have been recognized for the fair value of stock options granted in the first quarter of fiscal 2004.

     The following table summarizes the major captions of the Statement of Earnings as a percentage of net sales:

Net Sales

Worldwide consolidated net sales for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 were up 14.7 percent and 13.2 percent, respectively, from the same periods in the prior year. Factoring out the effect of our southeastern-based distributorship sold in October 2004, our southwestern-based distributorship sold in November 2004, and the additional sales from our acquisition of Hayter in February 2005, net sales for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 increased 12.1 percent and 11.9 percent, respectively, from the same periods in the prior year. The net sales increase was led by strong international sales that were up by 41.1 percent for the second quarter and 32.2 percent for the six-month period over the same periods in the prior year. Factoring out the additional sales from the acquisition of Hayter, international sales for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 were up 25.2 percent and 22.7 percent, respectively, from the same periods in the prior year, driven primarily by strong customer demand, new product introductions, and a weaker U.S. dollar. Favorable currency rates contributed approximately 0.9 percent of the overall sales growth for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 and 1.2 percent of the sales growth for the first six months of fiscal 2005. Strong professional segment sales also contributed to the sales growth as a result of: (i) positive market conditions and strong retail demand, mainly for our mowing equipment products; (ii) price increases introduced on some products; and (iii) the success of introducing new products within the past two years. Residential segment sales were also up due mainly to the additional placement related to the introduction of new Lawn-Boy products in the home center distribution channel, somewhat offset by lower shipments of riding products and retail irrigation products. The other segment net sales were down for the second quarter and year-to-date periods of fiscal 2005 compared to the same periods last year due to the sale of the two distribution companies, as previously mentioned.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 increased 8.9 percent and 8.6 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods of the prior year due to increased sales. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 was 34.5 percent and 34.7 percent, respectively, compared to 36.3 percent and 36.2 percent for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2004, respectively. These decreases in gross profit as a percentage of net sales were the result of the following factors: (i) higher costs for steel, resin, and other commodities and (ii) the Hayter acquisition that negatively impacted gross margins due to the purchase accounting effect of recording the fair value of the inventory acquired as the inventory was sold. Somewhat offsetting these negative factors were (i) price increases introduced on some products; (ii) cost reduction efforts from profit improvement initiatives; (iii) lower manufacturing costs from increased plant utilization; and (iv) favorable foreign currency exchange rates compared to the U.S. dollar.

14

Selling, General, and Administrative Expense

Selling, general, and administrative expense (SG&A) increased for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 by 2.0 percent and 4.0 percent, respectively, from the same periods of the prior year. SG&A as a percentage of net sales for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 was 19.0 percent and 22.7 percent, respectively, compared to 21.4 percent and 24.8 percent for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2004, respectively. These decreases in SG&A expense as a percentage of net sales were due primarily to: (i) leveraging fixed SG&A costs over higher sales volumes; (ii) lower stock-based compensation expense due to the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R; and (iii) reduced warranty costs for the year-to-date comparison as a result of a special provision during fiscal 2004 for a product modification. Somewhat offsetting those decreases were: (i) increased investments in engineering as part of our “6 + 8” initiative and (ii) higher administrative expenses, mainly from continued investments in information systems, increased insurance costs, and higher bad debt expense due mainly to the effect of collecting receivables in fiscal 2004 that were previously written off.

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 increased by 31.6 percent and 13.8 percent, respectively, from the same periods in the prior year. These increases were primarily due to higher levels of short-term debt as a result of increased cash used for the acquisition of Hayter and stock repurchases, as well as higher interest rates.

Other Income, Net

Other income, net for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 was $0.9 million and $2.1 million, respectively. These amounts represent increases of $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, from the same periods in the prior year. These increases were due primarily to lower litigation expense and currency exchange rate losses during the year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 compared to the same period last year.

Provision for Income Taxes

The effective tax rate for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 remained unchanged at 33.5 percent compared to the same periods in the prior year.

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

As described previously, we operate in two reportable business segments: professional and residential. A third reportable segment called “other” consists of domestic company-owned distributorships, corporate activities, and financing functions. Operating earnings (loss) for each of our two business segments is defined as earnings (loss) from operations plus other income, net. Effective the beginning of fiscal 2005, the company combined the distribution segment with the other segment because Toro’s distribution segment no longer met the quantitative thresholds for separate reporting as an operating segment for all periods presented. Prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Operating loss for our third “other” segment includes earnings (loss) from operations, corporate activities, including corporate financing activities, other income, net, and interest expense.

15

The following table summarizes net sales by segment:

The following table summarizes operating earnings (loss) by segment:

Professional

Net Sales. Worldwide net sales for the professional segment in the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 were up 14.9 percent and 16.1 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. Factoring out the additional sales from the acquisition of Hayter, professional segment net sales for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 were up 12.8 percent and 14.8 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. Worldwide professional segment sales of most product lines were up due to (i) positive market conditions and strong retail demand, mainly for our mowing equipment products; (ii) price increases introduced on some products; and (iii) the success of introducing new products within the past two years. Excluding the additional sales from the acquisition of Hayter, international professional segment net sales in the second quarter and year-to-date of fiscal 2005 increased 19.2 percent and 18.4 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year due to the same reasons mentioned above, as well as the benefits of a weaker U.S. dollar. Field inventory levels for some product lines in this segment increased from the comparable quarter due to strong orders from our customers in anticipation of strong retail demand during fiscal 2005, initial stocking orders for new products introduced during fiscal 2005, and abnormally low levels of field inventory compared to the same period last year.

16

Operating Earnings. Operating earnings for the professional segment in the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 increased 18.0 percent and 23.3 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, professional segment operating margins increased to 21.8 percent compared to 21.2 percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, and the fiscal 2005 year-to-date professional segment operating margins increased to 19.5 percent compared to 18.3 percent last year. The profit improvement was the result of lower SG&A expense as a percentage of net sales due to leveraging the fixed portion of SG&A costs over higher sales volumes. Gross margins rose slightly as a result of cost reduction efforts from profit improvement initiatives, lower manufacturing costs from increased plant utilization, and price increases introduced on some products, somewhat offset by higher steel and other commodity costs and lower gross margins from the acquisition of Hayter.

Residential

Net Sales. Worldwide net sales for the residential segment in the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 were up by 16.9 percent and 10.5 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. Factoring out the additional sales from the acquisition of Hayter, residential segment net sales for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 were up 11.4 percent and 6.9 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. This increase was led by strong sales of walk power mowers for initial stocking orders of Lawn-Boy walk power mowers due to expanded sku placement in the home center distribution channel, somewhat offset by lower shipments of Toro brand walk power mowers as a result of the shift of sales to the new line of Lawn-Boy walk power mowers. Shipments of Toro walk power mowers to distributors/dealers were also up due to the introduction of new products. Higher snow thrower product shipments also contributed to the year-to-date sales increase due to the successful introduction of new products, as well as heavy snowfalls in key markets. Excluding the additional sales from the acquisition of Hayter, international residential segment net sales in the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 increased by 48.7 percent and 36.5 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year due to the successful introduction of new products and a weaker U.S. dollar. Somewhat offsetting those increases were lower riding product shipments due to continued strong competition and initial stocking orders last year for the TimeCutter® zero-turning radius riding mowers as a result of expanded placement in the home center distribution channel, somewhat offset by higher Lawn-Boy riding product sales as a result of initial stocking orders. Retail irrigation product sales also declined from the comparable periods last year primarily due to unfavorable weather conditions in key domestic markets.

Operating Earnings. Operating earnings for the residential segment in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 increased 8.4 percent compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2004. However, operating earnings for the residential segment for the year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 were down by 4.7 percent compared to the same period last year. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, residential segment operating margin decreased to 12.7 percent compared to 13.7 percent in the second quarter of fiscal 2004, and fiscal 2005 year-to-date residential segment operating margin decreased to 10.3 percent compared to 12.0 percent last year. The decrease was due mainly to lower gross margins as a result of higher costs for steel and other commodities with minimal price increases, and lower gross margins from the acquisition of Hayter. Somewhat offsetting the operating earnings decrease was lower SG&A expense due mainly to leveraging the fixed portion of SG&A costs over higher sales volumes and reduced warranty costs as a result of a special provision last year for a product modification.

Other

Net Sales. Net sales for the other segment include sales from our wholly owned domestic distribution companies less sales from the professional and residential segments to those distribution companies. In addition, elimination of the professional and residential segments’ floor plan interest costs from Toro Credit Company are also included in this segment. The other segment net sales declined for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 by 20.4 percent and 22.9 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods last year due to the sale of the two distribution companies, as previously mentioned.

Operating Losses. Operating losses for the other segment were up for the second quarter and year-to-date period of fiscal 2005 by $0.5 million or 2.4 percent and $4.2 million or 9.9 percent, respectively, compared to the same periods last year. The increased losses were due to the following factors: (i) higher administrative costs, mainly from continued investments in information systems, increased insurance costs, and higher bad debt expense due to the effect of collecting receivables in fiscal 2004 that were previously written off; (ii) an increase in interest expense; and (iii) lower operating earnings from the domestic company owned distributors. Somewhat offsetting those negative factors was lower stock-based compensation expense due to the impact of adopting SFAS No. 123R.

17

FINANCIAL POSITION

Working Capital

During the first half of fiscal 2005, our financial condition remained strong and emphasis continued on improving asset management. Average working capital for the first half of fiscal 2005 was $306.6 million compared to $373.0 million for the first half of fiscal 2004. The decrease of 17.8 percent was due to higher average short-term debt, lower average cash and cash equivalents, and higher average accounts payables and accrued liabilities, somewhat offset by higher average accounts receivable. The primary factor contributing to the higher average short-term debt and lower cash levels was our continued emphasis on repurchasing shares of our common stock during the first half of fiscal 2005 and our purchase of Hayter. Average receivables for the first half of fiscal 2005 increased by 12.2 percent compared to the first half of fiscal 2004 on a sales increase of 13.2 percent. Factoring out the incremental average receivables for Hayter, average receivables were up 6.3 percent. Our average days sales outstanding for receivables improved to 71.8 days based on sales for the last twelve months ended April 29, 2005, compared to 76.8 days for the twelve months ended April 30, 2004. Average inventory levels increased slightly by 3.0 percent for the first half of fiscal 2005 compared to the first half of fiscal 2004; however, factoring out the incremental average inventories for Hayter, average inventory levels were down 2.0 percent. Average inventory turnover improved 10.0 percent for the last twelve months ended April 29, 2005 compared to the last twelve months ended April 30, 2004. These improvements reflect our continuing efforts to improve asset utilization.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our businesses are seasonally working capital intensive and require funding for purchases of raw materials used in production, replacement parts inventory, capital expenditures, expansion and upgrading of existing facilities, as well as for financing receivables from customers. We believe that cash generated from operations, together with our fixed rate long-term debt, bank credit lines, and cash on hand, will provide us with adequate liquidity to meet our operating requirements. We believe that the funds available through existing or anticipated financing arrangements and forecasted cash flows, will be sufficient to provide the necessary capital resources for our anticipated working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt repayments, dividend payments, and stock repurchases for at least the next twelve months.

     Our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend of $0.06 per share for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 paid on April 12, 2005, as adjusted to reflect a two-for-one stock split effective March 28, 2005, which was an increase over our dividend of $0.03 per share for the second quarter of fiscal 2004.

Cash Flow. Cash used in operating activities for the first six months of fiscal 2005 was 40.2 percent higher than the first six months of fiscal 2004 due primarily to a higher increase in receivables and inventory levels for the first six months of fiscal 2005 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2004, somewhat offset by higher earnings. Cash used in investing activities was higher by $27.0 million compared to the first six months of fiscal 2004, due mainly to cash utilized for the purchase of Hayter, somewhat offset by lower purchases of property, plant, and equipment. Cash provided by financing activities was higher by $54.2 million compared to the first six months of fiscal 2004. This change was due to a higher increase in short-term debt and lower repayments of long-term debt, somewhat offset by an increase of $70.2 million in shares of our common stock repurchased during the first six months of fiscal 2005 compared to the first six months of fiscal 2004.

Credit Lines and Other Capital Resources. Our business is seasonal, with accounts receivable balances historically increasing between January and April as a result of higher sales volumes and extended payment terms made available to our customers, and decreasing between May and December when payments are received. The seasonality of production and shipments causes our working capital requirements to fluctuate during the year. Our peak borrowing usually occurs between February and May. Seasonal cash requirements are financed from operations and with short- and medium-term financing arrangements, including a $175.0 million unsecured senior five-year revolving credit facility, which expires in September 2009. We also have a $75.0 million secured credit line backed by a multi-year credit agreement, expiring in July 2006, which is renewable annually. Interest expense on these credit lines is determined based on a LIBOR or commercial paper rate plus a basis point spread defined in the credit agreements. In addition, our non-U.S. operations and a domestic subsidiary also maintain unsecured short-term lines of credit of approximately $16.6 million. These facilities bear interest at various rates depending on the rates in their respective countries of operation. We also have a letter of credit subfacility as part of our credit agreements. Average short-term debt was $85.1 million in the first half of fiscal 2005 compared to $9.4 million in the first half of fiscal 2004, an increase of $75.7 million. This increase was primarily attributable to shares of our common stock repurchased during the year and the purchase of Hayter. As of April 29, 2005, we had $115.4 million of unutilized availability under our credit agreements.

18

     Significant financial covenants in our credit agreements are interest coverage and debt to capitalization ratios. We were in compliance with all covenants related to our credit agreements as of April 29, 2005, and expect to be in compliance with all covenants during the remainder of fiscal 2005. If we were out of compliance with any covenant required by our credit agreements, the banks could terminate their commitments unless we could negotiate a covenant waiver from the banks. In addition, our long-term public notes and debentures could become due and payable if we were unable to obtain a covenant waiver or refinance our medium-term debt under our credit agreements. If our credit rating falls below investment grade, the interest rate we currently pay on outstanding debt under the credit agreements would increase, but the credit commitments could not be cancelled by the banks based only on a ratings downgrade. Our debt rating for long-term unsecured senior, non-credit enhanced debt was unchanged for the second quarter of fiscal 2005 by Standard and Poor’s Ratings Group at BBB- and by Moody’s Investors Service at Baa3.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Our off-balance sheet arrangements generally relate to customer financing activities, inventory purchase commitments, operating lease commitments, and currency contracts. See our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details regarding our off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations. There has been no material change in this information.

Inflation

We are subject to the effects of inflation and changing prices. In the first half of fiscal 2005, average prices paid for steel, fuel, petroleum-based resins, and other commodities were higher compared to the first half of fiscal 2004, which resulted in a negative impact on our gross margin and net earnings. We expect this trend to continue for the remainder of fiscal 2005. We are attempting to mitigate the impact of these commodity price increases as well as other inflationary pressures by actively pursuing internal cost reduction efforts. In addition, we also introduced price increases on some products in fiscal 2005.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, we must make decisions which impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures. Such decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In reaching such decisions, we apply judgments based on our understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances, historical experience, and actuarial valuations. Actual amounts could differ from those estimated at the time the consolidated financial statements are prepared.

     Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2004. Some of those significant accounting policies require us to make difficult subjective or complex judgments or estimates. An accounting estimate is considered to be critical if it meets both of the following criteria: (i) the estimate requires assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the accounting estimate is made, and (ii) different estimates reasonably could have been used or changes in the estimates that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period would have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition, changes in financial condition or results of operations. Our critical accounting estimates include the following:

Warranty Reserve. Warranty coverage on our products ranges from a period of six months to seven years, and covers parts, labor, and other expenses for non-maintenance repairs, provided operator abuse, improper use or negligence did not necessitate the repair. At the time of sale, we accrue a warranty reserve by product line for estimated costs in connection with future warranty claims. We also establish reserves for major rework campaigns upon approval. The amount of our warranty reserves is based primarily on the estimated number of products under warranty, historical average costs incurred to service warranty claims, the trend in the historical ratio of claims to sales, and the historical length of time between the sale and resulting warranty claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our warranty reserves based on changes in these factors and record any necessary adjustments if actual claim experience indicates that adjustments are necessary. Actual claims could be higher or lower than amounts estimated, as the amount and value of warranty claims are subject to variation based on such factors as performance of new products, significant manufacturing or design defects not discovered until after the product is delivered to customers, product failure rates, and higher or lower than expected service costs for a repair. We believe that analysis of historical trends and knowledge of potential manufacturing or design problems provide sufficient information to establish a reasonable estimate for warranty claims at the time of sale. However, since we cannot predict with certainty future warranty

19

claims or costs associated with servicing those claims, our actual warranty costs may differ from our estimates. An unexpected increase in warranty claims or in the costs associated with servicing those claims would result in an increase in our warranty accrual and a decrease in our net earnings. The accrual for future estimated warranty claims was $67.4 million as of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2005 compared to $65.9 million as of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2004.

Accounts and Notes Receivable Valuation. We value accounts and notes receivable, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Each quarter, we estimate our ability to collect outstanding receivables that provides a basis for an allowance estimate for doubtful accounts. In doing so, we evaluate the age of our receivables, past collection history, current financial conditions of key customers, and economic conditions. Based on this evaluation, we establish a reserve for specific accounts and notes receivable that we believe are uncollectible, as well as an estimate of uncollectible receivables not specifically known. Portions of our accounts receivable are protected by a security interest in products held by customers, which minimizes our collection exposure. A deterioration in the financial condition of any key customer or a significant slow down in the economy could have a material negative impact on our ability to collect a portion or all of the accounts and notes receivable. We believe that an analysis of historical trends and our current knowledge of potential collection problems provide us with sufficient information to establish a reasonable estimate for an allowance for doubtful accounts. However, since we cannot predict with certainty future changes in the financial stability of our customers, our actual future losses from uncollectible accounts may differ from our estimates. In the event we determined that a smaller or larger uncollectible accounts reserve is appropriate, we would record a credit or charge to selling, general, and administrative expense in the period that we made such a determination. As of April 29, 2005, we had $3.2 million reserved against our accounts and notes receivable compared to $3.7 million as of April 30, 2004.

New Accounting Pronouncements To Be Adopted

In March 2005, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations,” an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143. FASB Interpretation No. 47 clarifies the timing of liability recognition for legal obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets when the timing and (or) method of settlement are conditional on a future event. We are currently evaluating the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 47 and will adopt it on November 1, 2005, as required.

     In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs,” which amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, “Inventory Pricing,” to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material. This Statement requires that those items be recognized as current-period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of “so abnormal.” In addition, this Statement requires that the allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS No. 151 and will adopt it on November 1, 2005, as required. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 151 will have an impact on our future fiscal year results; however, our results between quarterly periods could be impacted.

20

Forward-Looking Information

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains not only historical information, but also forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, we or others on our behalf may make forward-looking statements from time to time in oral presentations, including telephone conferences and/or web casts open to the public, in press releases or reports, on our Internet web sites or otherwise. Statements that are not historical are forward-looking and reflect expectations and assumptions. We try to identify forward-looking statements in this report and elsewhere by using words such as “expect”, “looking ahead”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “believe”, “should”, “intend”, and similar expressions. Our forward-looking statements generally relate to our future performance, including our anticipated operating results and liquidity requirements, our business strategies and goals, and the effect of laws, rules and regulations and outstanding litigation on our business.

     Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. These uncertainties include factors that affect all businesses operating in a global market as well as matters specific to Toro. The following are some of the factors known to us that could cause our actual results to differ materially from what we have anticipated in our forward-looking statements:

21

We wish to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement which speaks only as of the date made and to recognize that forward-looking statements are predictions of future results, which may not occur as anticipated. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements and from historical results, due to the risks and uncertainties described above, as well as others that we may consider immaterial or do not anticipate at this time. The foregoing risks and uncertainties are not exclusive and further information concerning the company and our businesses, including factors that potentially could materially affect our financial results or condition, may emerge from time to time. We assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect actual results or changes in factors or assumptions affecting such forward-looking statements. We advise you, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our future quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K we file with or furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

22

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to market risk stemming from changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, and commodity prices. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in our net earnings and cash flows. See further discussions on these market risks below.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk. In the normal course of business, we actively manage the exposure to foreign currency market risk by entering into various hedging instruments, authorized under company policies that place controls on these activities, with counterparties that are highly rated financial institutions. Our hedging activities involve the use of a variety of derivative financial instruments. We use derivative instruments only in an attempt to limit underlying exposure from currency fluctuations and to minimize earnings and cash volatility associated with foreign exchange rate changes, and not for trading purposes. We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk arising from transactions in the normal course of business, such as sales and loans to wholly owned subsidiaries as well as sales to third party customers, purchases from suppliers, and bank lines of credit with creditors denominated in foreign currencies. Because our products are manufactured or sourced primarily from the United States, a stronger U.S. dollar generally has a negative impact on results from operations outside the United States while a weaker dollar generally has a positive effect. Our primary exchange rate exposures are with the Euro, the Japanese yen, the Australian dollar, the Canadian dollar, the British pound, and the Mexican peso against the U.S. dollar.

     We enter into various contracts, principally forward contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change, to protect the value of existing foreign currency assets, liabilities, anticipated sales, and probable commitments. Decisions on whether to use such contracts are made based on the amount of exposures to the currency involved, and an assessment of the near-term market value for each currency. Worldwide foreign currency exchange rate exposures are reviewed monthly. The gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the value of the related exposures. Therefore, changes in market values of these hedge instruments are highly correlated with changes in market values of underlying hedged items both at inception of the hedge and over the life of the hedge contract. During the three and six months ended April 29, 2005, the amount of losses reclassified to earnings for such cash flow hedges was $0.9 million and $2.2 million, respectively. For the six months ended April 29, 2005, the losses treated as a reduction of net sales for contracts to hedge trade sales were $2.7 million and the gains treated as a reduction of cost of sales for contracts to hedge inventory purchases were $0.5 million.

     The following foreign currency exchange contracts held by us have maturity dates in fiscal 2005. All items are non-trading and stated in U.S. dollars. Some derivative instruments we enter into do not meet the hedging criteria of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities;” therefore, changes in their fair value are recorded in other income, net. The average contracted rate, notional amount, pre-tax value of derivative instruments in accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL), and fair value impact of derivative instruments in other income, net as of April 29, 2005 were as follows:

Interest Rate Risk. We are exposed to interest rate risk arising from transactions that are entered into during the normal course of business. Our short-term debt rates are dependent upon a LIBOR or commercial paper rate plus a basis point spread defined in our credit agreements. See our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K (Item 7A). There has been no material change in this information.

Commodity Price Risk. Some raw materials used in our products are exposed to commodity price changes. We manage some of this risk by using a combination of short- and long-term agreements with some vendors. The primary commodity price exposures are with steel, aluminum, fuel, petroleum-based resins, plastic resin, and linerboard. Further information regarding rising prices for steel and other commodities is presented in Item 2, section entitled “Inflation.”

23

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such period. There was no change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company’s fiscal second quarter ended April 29, 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On June 3, 2004, eight individuals who claim to have purchased lawnmowers in Illinois and Minnesota filed a lawsuit (Ronnie Phillips et al. v. Sears Roebuck Corporation et. al., No.04-L-334 (20th Judicial Circuit, St., Clair County, IL)) against the company and other defendants alleging that the horsepower labels on the products the plaintiffs purchased were inaccurate. The plaintiffs seek certification of a class of all persons in the United States who, beginning January 1, 1995 through the present, purchased a lawnmower containing a two stroke or four stroke gas combustible engine up to 20 horsepower that was manufactured or sold by the defendants. The complaint seeks an injunction, unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees. No answers have been entered in the case, and there has been no formal discovery. A number of procedural motions have been filed by the defendants, but have not yet been decided. On April 20, 2005, the court issued a stay of discovery and procedural matters to permit the parties to engage in settlement discussions. Management continues to evaluate this lawsuit. The company is unable to reasonably estimate the amount or range of potential loss that could result from this litigation, and therefore has not established a reserve for any potential loss in connection with this lawsuit. The company is also unable to assess at this time whether the lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated operating results or financial condition.

     We are a party to litigation in the ordinary course of business. Litigation occasionally involves claims for punitive as well as compensatory damages arising out of use of our products. We are also subject to administrative proceedings with respect to claims involving the discharge of hazardous substances into the environment. Some of these claims assert damages and liability for remedial investigations and clean up costs. We are also typically involved in commercial disputes, employment disputes, and patent litigation cases in the ordinary course of business, both as a plaintiff and as a defendant. While the ultimate results of the current cases are unknown at this time, management believes that, except for the lawsuit discussed above, the outcomes of these cases are unlikely to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated operating results or financial position. Further, we maintain insurance against some product liability losses.

24

Item 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The following table shows our second quarter of fiscal 2005 stock repurchase activity. Shares and per share data have been adjusted for all periods presented to reflect a two-for-one stock split effective March 28, 2005.

25

Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

(a) The Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on March 15, 2005.

(b) The results of the stockholder votes were as follows:

Janet K. Cooper, Kendrick B. Melrose, Gregg W. Steinhafel, and Edwin H. Wingate continue to serve as directors of the company for terms expiring in March 2006.

Robert C. Buhrmaster, Winslow H. Buxton, Robert H. Nassau, and Christopher A. Twomey continue to serve as directors of the company for terms expiring in March 2007.

26

Item 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits

27

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

28

Exhibit 10(a)

The Toro Company
Annual Management Incentive Plan II

Exhibit 31(a)

Certification pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Michael J. Hoffman, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Toro Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

Date: June 6, 2005

Exhibit 31(b)

Certification pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Stephen P. Wolfe, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Toro Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

Date: June 6, 2005

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of The Toro Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 29, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Michael J. Hoffman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Stephen P. Wolfe, Vice President-Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.